Petitioner challenged a Tahsildar's order issuing patta for a lesser extent than stated in his sale deed. The Court set aside the impugned order and directed the Tahsildar to consider a fresh representation after notice to interested persons and pass orders in accordance with law within six weeks. Writ petition disposed of without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.5404 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 15.03.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
W.P(MD)No.5404 of 2021
M.Anandharaj
... Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the third respondent in his proceedings Aa7/2866/2020, dated 26.11.2020 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, direct the respondents to issue fresh patta to the petitioner as per measurement mentioned in sale document, dated 11.05.2015.
1/5
W.P(MD)No.5404 of 2021
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Banuprasath
For Respondents : Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandran, Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
The Writ Petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed
by the third respondent in his proceedings Aa7/2866/2020, dated 26.11.2020 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, direct the respondents to issue fresh patta to the petitioner as per measurement mentioned in sale document, dated 11.05.2015.
3.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that one Amuthavalli was given free patta considering the eligibility and that if the petitioner is aggrieved, he may be directed to give fresh representation and the third respondent may be
2/5
W.P(MD)No.5404 of 2021
directed to consider the same taking note of the sale deed and other documents and to pass orders within the time stipulated by this Court.
costs.
15.03.2024
NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No das
3/5
W.P(MD)No.5404 of 2021
To
4/5
W.P(MD)No.5404 of 2021
K.MURALI SHANKAR, J
das
Order made in W.P(MD)No.5404 of 2021
Dated : 14.03.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the patta issued with a lesser extent, ignoring the petitioner's sale deed, should be quashed and fresh patta issued as per the sale document measurement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Anandharaj
The District Collector, Thoothukudi
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovipatti
The Tahsildar, Ottapitaram Taluk
K.MURALI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
