pathway is belonging to the Government and is under the control and maintenance of the third defendant; that the first defendant has been making constructions in his property in S.No.324/1460/2 and while making constructions, he is attempting to encroach a portion in the suit pathway and making constructions therein; that the plaintiff has lodged a complaint with the third respondent for which, the third respondent informed that no permission was granted to the first defendant for making any constructions; that when a compliant was lodged before the District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram, the second defendant had visited the suit property and passed an order, dated 10.01.2012, directing the first defendant not to make any encroachment in the suit pathway; that since the first defendant has started to make constructions and as there was no action from the defendants 2 and 3, the plaintiff was constrained to file a suit and to file an injunction application in I.A.No.43 of 2012; that the trial Court, after enquiry has suo motu appointed an Advocate Commissioner to visit the property and measure the same with the help of surveyor and the Village Administrative Officer and directed the parties to maintain status quo to be found by the Advocate Commissioner; that the Advocate Commissioner had visited the property and measured the same and found
