Dismissed

Jothi v. Cheriyapillai Nadar (Died)

Madras HC18 Dec 2024CRP(MD)/185/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) disposed of Civil Revision Petition No.185 of 2020 after the petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw the revision. The civil revision petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed. Judgment dated 18.12.2024.

What did the court decide?

The civil revision petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn. No costs awarded. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Jothi Vs Cheriyapillai Nadar (Died) — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.R.P.(MD)No.185 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 18.12.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

¶6

C.R.P.(MD)No.185 of 2020 and C.M.P.(MD).No.1077 of 2020

1.Jothi

2.Razinal

3.Suresh

4.Vincent ... Petitioners 1 to 4/Petitioners 1 to 4/ Respondents 3, 11, 12, 14/3^rd Defendant and Lrs of 2^nd Defendant

¶11

Vs.

¶12

Cheriyapillai Nadar (Died) Sathianesan (Died)

¶13

1.Banuvel

¶14

2.Devadhas ... Respondents 1 & 2/Respondents 3 & 4/ Petitioners 3 & 4/Plaintiffs 3 & 4

¶15

3.Rajamony

¶16

4.Chinthamony

¶17

5.Selvadhas

¶18

6.Sarasam

¶19

7.Maria Pushpam

¶20

8.Beula

¶21

9.Sepsi

¶22

10.Sheeba

11.Ebenezar

12.Janet

13.John Solomon

14.Rajamony Ismi ... Respondents 3 to 14/Respondents 5 to 16/ Petitioners 6 to 17/Plaintiffs Valliamma (died)

¶27

1/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

C.R.P.(MD)No.185 of 2020

¶30

Packianathan (Died)

¶31

15.Nesammal 16.Selvam 17.Lalithabai 18.Raphi ... Respondents 15 to 18/Respondent 19 to 22/ Respondent 4 to 17/Defendants 4 to 7

¶32

19.Christal Jeyanthi 20.Lalitharani 21.Nambiyar 22.Santhosh 23.Rosemary ... Respondents 19 to 23/Respondents 23 to 27/ Respondents 8 to 10, 12 & 15/Defendants

¶33

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed by the Principal District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai in unnumbered E.A.(CF.No. 4268 of 2019) in E.P.No.19 of 2017 in O.S.No.658 of 1974 dated 15.10.2019.

¶34

For Petitioner : Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar For Respondents : Mr.D.Senthil for R5

¶35

ORDER

¶36

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for

¶37

the revision petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present case. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

2/4

¶40

C.R.P.(MD)No.185 of 2020

¶41

2.Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the revision

¶42

petitioner, this civil revision petitioner stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶43

18.12.2024

¶44

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No TM

¶45

¶46

1.The Principal District Munsif, Kuzhithurai.

¶47

2.The Section Officer, E.R.Section/V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

3/4

¶50

C.R.P.(MD)No.185 of 2020

¶51

G.ILANGOVAN ,J.

¶52

¶53

C.R.P.(MD)No.185 of 2020

¶54

18.12.2024

¶55

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶56

4/4

Jothi v. Cheriyapillai Nadar (Died)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jothi v. Cheriyapillai Nadar (Died)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.Karunakaran Vs Immanuel Mancy @ Shandhini

Immanuel Mancy @ Sandhini Vs The Inspector of Police

G.Rajendran Vs R.Iraivan

Subramani Vs a.Velusamy

A.Eswari Vs M/S.Hdb Financial Services Ltd.

Seethalakshmi Vs Manickam