Disposed

V.Sudhakaran v. Mehaboob Bi (Deceased)

Madras HC3 Jun 2024CRP/3419/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil Revision Petition against an interlocutory order in a pending appeal before the Subordinate Judge, Ranipet. Counsel informed the court that the underlying appeal was dismissed for default and not restored; the revision petition was accordingly closed as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed as infructuous; liberty to move again if appeal A.S.No.26 of 1995 is restored.

V.Sudhakaran Vs Mehaboob Bi (Deceased) — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.R.P.No.3419 of 2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 03.06.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

¶6

C.R.P.No.3419 of 2015

and

M.P.No.1 of 2015

1.V.Sudhakaran

2.S.Suguna

¶11

3.Shanthaamal … Petitioners

¶12

¶13

Mehaboob Bi (deceased) Abdul Baig (died)

¶14

1.Kasim Baig

¶15

2.Hussain Baig

¶16

3.Manna Bi

¶17

4.Fathima Bi

¶18

5.Zaina Bi

¶19

6.Piyari Bi

¶20

7.Shamshad Begum

¶21

8.Zareena Begum

¶22

9.Sardar

¶23

10.Kannan

¶24

11.Mahalingam

¶25

12.Mohanambal

¶26

13.Murthy

¶27

14.Vijayalakshmi

¶28

Page No: 1/5

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

15.P.Sivakami 16.Sumathy … Respondents

¶31

C.R.P.No.3419 of 2015

¶32

PRAYER:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 27.11.2014 made in I.A.No.57 of 2013 in A.S.No.26 of 1995 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Ranipet.

¶33

ORDER

¶34

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated 27.11.2014 in I.A.No.57 of 2013 in A.S.No.26 of 1995 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Ranipet.

¶35

During the course of the hearing, today the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the appeal in A.S.No.26 of 1995 pending on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Ranipet has been dismissed for default on 30.10.2023. As per his information, no steps have been taken for restoration of the appeal till now. The learned counsel for the petitioner further sought permission to restore the Civil Revision

¶36

Page No: 2/5

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

C.R.P.No.3419 of 2015

¶39

Petition if any order to be passed by the Appellate court in A.S.No. 26 of 1995.

¶40

The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is

¶41

placed on record. Having considered the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, in our view, this Civil Revision Petition can be closed as infructuous.

¶42

In the light of the fact that the appeal in A.S.No.26 of 1995 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Ranipet has been dismissed on 30.10.2023, it is open to the petitioner to make appropriate application in the Civil Revision Petition if the appeal is restored.

¶43

Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is closed as

¶44

infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶45

03.06.2024

¶46

gba Index : Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No Neutral Citations : Yes/No

¶47

Page No: 3/5

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

C.R.P.No.3419 of 2015

¶50

¶51

The Subordinate Judge, Ranipet

¶52

BATTU DEVANAND,J.

¶53

gba

¶54

C.R.P.No.3419 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015

¶55

Page No: 4/5

¶56

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶57

C.R.P.No.3419 of 2015

¶58

03.06.2024

¶59

Page No: 5/5

¶60

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

V.Sudhakaran v. Mehaboob Bi (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Sudhakaran v. Mehaboob Bi (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kousalya@Krishnaveni Vs P.Shanmugasamy Chettiar(Died)

Aminuthantakath Bepathu (Deceased) Vs J.M.H.Hassan Moulana

S.Dhandapani, Retd. Secondary Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

Sarathambal Vs Kannan

R.Annamalai Vs Kalyaniammal

R.Annamalai Vs Kalyaniammal