Sarathambal v. Kannan
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil revision petition against a transfer order; counsel stated subsequent developments made further adjudication unnecessary, and the court dismissed the petition as infructuous with no costs.
What the court decided
C.R.P.No.2648 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.06.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
C.R.P.No.2648 of 2015 and
M.P.No.1 of 2015
1.Sarathambal 2.Pachaiammal 3.sarasu 4.Pandiyathurai 5.Palani … Petitioners Vs 1.Kannan 2.Sangeetha 3.Rajeswari 4.Selvi 5.Nirmala 6.Murugan 7.Arulmozhi 8.Murugan … Respondents
PRAYER:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair an decretal order in Transfer O.P.No.115 of 2014 dated 17.04.2015 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Villupuram.
Page No: 1/4
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sarathambal
- petitioner
Pachaiammal
- petitioner
sarasu
- petitioner
Pandiyathurai
- petitioner
Palani
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court