Disposed

Chennai Vazh Kovilpatti Nadar v. Chennai Vazh Kovilpatti Nadar

Madras HC14 Nov 2024CRP/2167/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revision petition sought a direction to the XIII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai to dispose of a pending fair rent proceeding (R.C.O.P.No.2099 of 2013) within a time frame. The court was informed that an order had already been passed in that proceeding on 27.01.2025 and closed the revision as no further orders were necessary.

What the court decided

AI extract

Chennai Vazh Kovilpatti Nadar Vs Chennai Vazh Kovilpatti… — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.R.P.(PD).No.2167 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 28.01.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN

¶6

C.R.P.(PD).No.2167 of 2024

¶7

Chennai Vazh Kovilpatti Nadar Uravinmurai Sangam, Reg. No: 45/1984, Rep. by its President K.Ramasamy Nadar, S/o Karuppiah Nadar, No:43 (18/1) L.B.Road, Adayar, Chennai – 600 020.

¶8

.. Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.Chennai Vazh Kovilpatti Nadar Uravinmurai Sangam, Reg. No: 61/2006, Rep. by its President L.M.Krishnasamy Nadar, No:43 (18/1) L.B.Road, Adayar, Chennai – 600 020.

¶11

2.M/s. Crescent Auto Repairs and services India (Private) Ltd., Rep. By its Director A.K.Abdullah, No: 43 (18/1) L.B.Road, Adayar, Chennai – 600 020. .. Respondents

¶12

Prayer : This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying for a direction to the XIII Small Causes Court, Chennai where the R.C.O.P.No.2099 of 2013 is pending to dispose of the fair rent proceeding within a time from.

¶13

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

C.R.P.(PD).No.2167 of 2024

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Packiaraj For R2 : Mr.Md.Shadaan

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

This civil revision petition has been filed for a direction to the learned

¶19

XIII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai, to dispose of R.C.O.P.No.2099 of

¶20

2013 within a specified time frame fixed by this Court.

¶21

2.Mr.Md.Shadaan representing the 2^nd respondent states that an order

¶22

has been passed in R.C.O.P.No.2099 of 2013 on 27.01.2025.

¶23

3.As order has been passed in R.C.O.P.No.2099 of 2013, no further

¶24

orders are necessary in this revision. No costs.

¶25

28.01.2025

¶26

krk

¶27

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No

¶28

2/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

C.R.P.(PD).No.2167 of 2024

¶31

¶32

The XIII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai.

¶33

3/4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

C.R.P.(PD).No.2167 of 2024

¶36

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

¶37

krk

¶38

C.R.P.(PD).No.2167 of 2024

¶39

28.01.2025

¶40

4/4

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Chennai Vazh Kovilpatti Nadar v. Chennai Vazh Kovilpatti Nadar

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Chennai Vazh Kovilpatti Nadar v. Chennai Vazh Kovilpatti Nadar

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kanakala Ramdass Vs Kona Narasaiah (Died)

Selvaraj Achari Vs M. Rajeswari

M/S.Isbanthiar Baig Jumma Masjid Vs Ashok Kumar

R.Gowrisankar,M/51 Vs R.M.Kathiresan

Prakash Vs Balambal

Getcy Jebamani Vs Valli @ Valliammal