Civil revision petition against an interlocutory order in CMP.No.20 of 2015 within A.S.No.108 of 2013. The appeal had been dismissed on 05.10.2018, so the interlocutory order could not be revised; the petitioner was left to challenge it under Section 105(1) CPC, and the revision petition was dismissed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.No.4120 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.11.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
C.R.P.No.4120 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
Selvaraja Achari .. Petitioner
Versus
M.Rajeswari .. Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 10.07.2015 made in CMP. No.20 of 2015 in A.S.No.108 of 2013 on the file of the XVI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Udhay Kumar
ORDER
This civil revision petition challenges the order passed by the XVI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai in CMP.No.20 of 2015 in A.S.No.108 of 2013.
1/4
C.R.P.No.4120 of 2015
13.11.2024
nl
Index : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : yes/no
2/4
C.R.P.No.4120 of 2015
To
The XVI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.
3/4
C.R.P.No.4120 of 2015
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
nl
C.R.P.No.4120 of 2015
13.11.2024
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Can a civil revision petition revise an interlocutory order pending an appeal that has since been disposed of?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Selvaraja Achari
M.Rajeswari
V.Lakshminarayanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
