Contempt petition alleging disobedience of a writ order; closed after counsel stated the stay had been extended until further orders, with liberty to revive.
Contempt petition closed with liberty to revive after disposal of the writ appeal; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont. P.No.1018 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.11.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Cont. P.No.1018 of 2024
R.Gowrisankar .. Petitioner
Versus
1.Prof.R.M.Kathiresan 2.Dr.R.Singaravel .. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.No.20192 of 2014 dated 26.06.2023.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganesh
For Respondent : Mr.S.Sithirai Anandan
ORDER
Since Mr.S.Sithirai Anandan states that since stay has been extended
until further orders, the contempt petition need not be kept pending.
1/3
Cont. P.No.1018 of 2024
granted to the petitioner to file an application to revive the contempt after disposal of the writ appeal in case the situation arises. No costs.
14.11.2024
nl
Index : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : yes/no
2/3
Cont. P.No.1018 of 2024
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
nl
Cont. P.No.1018 of 2024
14.11.2024
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Gowrisankar
Prof.R.M.Kathiresan
Dr.R.Singaravel
V.Lakshminarayanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
