Disposed

Sweety v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Madras HC8 Jan 2024CRL OP(MD)/81/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners, accused in Crime No.468 of 2023 arising from an attack on their neighbour during a water motor dispute, sought directions to surrender before the Special Judge for SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Theni, and obtain bail. The Court disposed of the petition directing surrender within 15 days, with the Special Judge to hear the victim's objections and decide bail per law.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sweety Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.81 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 08.01.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP

¶6

CRL.O.P (MD) No.81 of 2024

¶7

1.Sweety

¶8

2.Dhavan Dev @ Dhavam

¶9

3.Dharanidharan ...Petitioners / Accused 1 to 3

¶10

Vs.

¶11

1.State by its

¶12

Deputy Superintendent of Police, Uthamapalayam Sub – Division,

¶13

Theni District.

¶14

The Sub Inspector of Police,

¶15

Uthamapalayam Police Station, Theni District. ...Respondents 1&2/Complainants

¶16

3.Selvi ... 3^rd Respondent / Defacto Complainant

¶17

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the Special Judge for SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Theni, to accept the surrender of the Petitioners in Crime No.468 of 2023 pending on the file of the 2^nd Respondent and enlarge the Petitioners on bail.

¶18

1/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.81 of 2024

¶21

For Petitioners : Mr.G.Rajan For Respondents : Mr.M.Veeranthiran Government Advocate (Crl.side) for R1&2

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the learned Special Judge for SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Theni, to accept the surrender of the Petitioners in Crime No.468 of 2023 pending on the file of the 2^nd Respondent and enlarge the Petitioners on bail.

¶24

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the Petitioners herein are A1 to A3. The Petitioners and the 3^rd Respondent / Defacto complainant are neighbours. As per the complaint of the third Respondent / Defacto Complainant, the Defacto Complainant is alleged to have asked the 1^st Petitioner to switch on the water motor, based on which, the dispute arose, on which, the Defacto complainant was attacked by the Petitioners herein. She was injured. She underwent treatment as out patient and discharged from the Hospital. There are no previous cases against the Petitioners.

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.81 of 2024

¶28

The learned counsel for the 3^rd Respondent / Defacto Complainant submits that the 3^rd Respondent was treated as Out Patient for 5 days and thereafter, discharged from the Hospital.

¶29

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioners, learned counsel for the 3^rd Respondent/ Defacto complainant and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. The Petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Special Judge for SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Theni, within 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order or from the date of uploading the copy of this order in the official web-site of this Court.

¶30

On such surrender by the Petitioners, the learned Special Judge for SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Theni, shall consider the bail application of the Petitioners and dispose of the same, after issuing notice to the 3^rd Respondent / Defacto complainant and after hearing their objections of the victim of the crime, pass appropriate orders as per law.

¶31

Internet:Yes./No 08.01.2024 Index:Yes/No NCC : Yes/No Ls

¶32

3/4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.81 of 2024

¶35

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.

¶36

¶37

¶38

1.The Special Judge for SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Theni

¶39

Deputy Superintendent of Police, Uthamapalayam Sub – Division,

¶40

Theni District.

¶41

The Sub Inspector of Police, Uthamapalayam Police Station,

¶42

Theni District.

¶43

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶44

Madurai.

¶45

CRL.O.P (MD) No.81 of 2024

¶46

08.01.2024

¶47

4/4

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Sweety v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sweety v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sasikumar P Vs The Superintendent of Police

Paramasivan Vs The Superintendent of Police

T.Pushpam Vs The Inspector General of Police

Dhanaraj Penthamin Vs The Superintendent of Police

P.Subashini Vs P.Palaniappan

P.Sethuramalingam Vs The Inspector of Police