Allowed

P.Sethuramalingam v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC8 Jan 2024CRL OP(MD)/160/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court recalled a non-bailable warrant issued against the petitioner for non-appearance in a cheque dishonour case. The court directed the petitioner to cooperate with the trial and the trial court to dispose of the case within a reasonable time.

What did the court decide?

The non-bailable warrant issued on 01.12.2023 is recalled; the petitioner is directed to cooperate with the pending trial.

P.Sethuramalingam Vs The Inspector of Police — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.160 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 08.01.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP

¶6

CRL.O.P (MD) No.160 of 2024

¶7

P.Sethuramalingam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State rep. by The Inspector of Police Chinnadharapuram Police Station, Karur District. 2.The State rep. by The Inspector of Police Rasipuram Police Station, Namakkal District. 3.S.Periyasami ... Respondents

¶8

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, direct the Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court Karur to recall the warrant issued against the petitioner in S.T.C.No.187/2020 dt.01.12.2023 on the file of the Fast Track Court at Magistrate Level Karur Karur District.

¶9

1/4

¶10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶11

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.160 of 2024

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murugappan For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar

¶13

Additional Public Prosecutor for R1&2

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court Karur to recall the warrant issued against the petitioner in S.T.C.No.187/2020 dt.01.12.2023 on the file of the Fast Track Court at Magistrate Level, Karur Karur District

¶16

The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is an Accused in the case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Petitioner did not appear before the trial Court on 01.12.2023, on which date, the learned Counsel for the Accused filed a Petition under Section 317 Cr.P.C., to condone his absence. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magistrate Level, Karur, Karur District had dismissed the Petition under Section 317 Cr.P.C and issued Non Bailable Warrant. Therefore, the Petitioner is forced to file this Petition seeking to recall the Warrant.

¶17

2/4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.160 of 2024

¶20

The learned Counsel for the Petitioner rely on the decision of this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.24229 of 2017, dated 08.12.2017, in which, on a similar set of fact, the learned Judge of this Court had set aside the order issued Non Bailable Warrant and direction to the trial Court.

¶21

In view of the above, the Non Bailable warrant issued on 01.12.2023 is recalled with a direction to the Petitioner to co-operate with

¶22

the pending trial before the Fast Track Court at Magistrate Level, Karur Karur District.

¶23

The learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magistrate

¶24

Level, Karur Karur District, is directed to dispose of the case within a reasonable time.

¶25

With the above directions, this Petition is disposed of.

¶26

Internet:Yes./No 08.01.2024 Index:Yes/No NCC : Yes/No Ls

¶27

3/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.160 of 2024

¶30

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.

¶31

¶32

Note:Issue order copy on 12.01.2024 To

¶33

1.The Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court,

¶34

Karur

¶35

The Inspector of Police Chinnadharapuram Police Station, Karur District.

¶36

3.The Inspector of Police Rasipuram Police Station, Namakkal District.

¶37

43.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶38

CRL.O.P (MD) No.160 of 2024

¶39

08.01.2024

¶40

4/4

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

P.Sethuramalingam v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Sethuramalingam v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sasikumar P Vs The Superintendent of Police

Paramasivan Vs The Superintendent of Police

T.Pushpam Vs The Inspector General of Police

Dhanaraj Penthamin Vs The Superintendent of Police

P.Subashini Vs P.Palaniappan

Sweety Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police