Prakash v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail petition dismissed as infructuous after the Government Advocate reported that the petitioner had already been arrested and remanded to judicial custody.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.3510 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.No.3469 of 2024
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody. Therefore, the anticipatory bail petition has become infructuous.
2.Recording the above submission of the learned Government (Criminal Side), this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands closed.
15.03.2024
smv
Coram
C.V.Karthikeyan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court