Anticipatory bail sought in a case of alleged assault and abuse of the defacto complainant due to previous enmity. The court noted the gravity of the offence and the petitioner's three previous pending cases and declined relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.29464 of 2024
Crl.O.P.No.29464 of 2024
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.
Apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.353 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 351(3) of BNS Act, the present petition has been filed seeking anticipatory bail.
3.The case of the prosecution as putforth by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police, opposing for grant of anticipatory bail, is that due to previous enmtiy, petitioner along with other accused attacked the defacto complainant and also abused in filthy language. He further submitted that, apart from this case, petitioner has three previous cases pending against the petitioner.
Page No.1 of 3
Crl.O.P.No.29464 of 2024
and also the fact that the petitioner has previous cases pending against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
26.11.2024
sma
Page No.2 of 3
Crl.O.P.No.29464 of 2024
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
sma
Crl.O.P.No.29464 of 2024
26.11.2024
Page No.3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in Crime No.353 of 2024 under BNS offences, given the gravity of the offence and pending previous cases against him.
6 provisions across 1 enactments
A.D. Jagadish Chandira
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
