Allowed

D.Elumalai v. the State Represented by

Madras HC25 Nov 2024CRL OP/29102/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who apprehended arrest for fabricated documents and property sale. Bail was granted subject to strict conditions including daily police reporting, execution of a bond with sureties, and prohibitions on tampering with evidence or absconding.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted with conditions to execute a bond with sureties, report daily to police, and not tamper with evidence or abscind.

D.Elumalai Vs the State Represented by — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.29102 of 2024

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.29102 of 2024

¶3

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

¶4

Apprehending arrest in connection in connection with Crime No.1 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120(b), 423, 463, 467, 468 & 471 of IPC, the present petition has been filed seeking anticipatory bail.

¶5

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused by fabrication of the legal heirship certificate sold the property belonging to the defacto complainant. Hence the case.

¶6

3.Pleading innocence on the part of the petitioner, false implication in the case, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks indulgence of this court. He would further submit that he has nothing to do with the said allegation and his name does not find place in the FIR. He would further submit that other than signing the petitoner has not involved in the offence of fabrication of documents. He would further submit that he is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court.

¶7

4.The case of the prosecution as putforth by the learned Government https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 1 of 4

¶8

Crl.O.P.No.29102 of 2024

¶9

Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, opposing for grant of anticipatory bail, is that the petitioner along with other accused by fabrication of the legal heirship certificate sold the property belonging to the defacto complainant. He would further submit that there is no previous case as against the petitioner.

¶10

5.Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶11

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate - II, Panrutti, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intend to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 2 of 4

¶13

Crl.O.P.No.29102 of 2024

¶14

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their

¶15

photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond

¶16

and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of his Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶17

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every day at 10.30 a.m. until further orders;

¶18

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or

¶19

witness either during investigation or trial;

¶20

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶21

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

¶22

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can

¶23

be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

Page 3 of 4

¶26

Crl.O.P.No.29102 of 2024

¶27

25.11.2024

¶28

¶29

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

¶30

¶31

Crl.O.P.No.29102 of 2024

¶32

25.11.2024

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

Page 4 of 4

D.Elumalai v. the State Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Elumalai v. the State Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.Swamynathan Vs the State Rep by Its

.R.Muruganandham Vs the State Rep by

Ammulu @ Parameswari Vs the State Rep.by

Basik Ahamed Vs the State Rep by Its

Muthu Vs State Rep by

Balaji Vs Santhakumar