Allowed

Chandrasekara Gurukkal v. State through the

Madras HC26 Nov 2024CRL OP/29276/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail sought in a case of abuse and assault on the defacto complainant allegedly out of previous enmity. The court granted anticipatory bail with conditions including bond with sureties, daily police reporting, non-tampering with evidence, citing the Supreme Court's decision in P.K.Shaji.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on conditions including Rs.10,000 bond with two like sureties and periodic reporting to police.

Chandrasekara Gurukkal Vs State through the — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.29276 of 2024

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.29276 of 2024

¶3

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

¶4

Apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.367 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(1) of IPC , the present petition has been filed seeking anticipatory bail.

¶5

2.Pleading innocence on the part of the petitioner, false implication in the case, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court. se. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court.

¶6

3.The case of the prosecution as putforth by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police, opposing for grant of anticipatory bail, due to previous enmity, petitioner along with other accused abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and also attacked him using hands.

¶7

Page No.1 of 4

¶8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶9

Crl.O.P.No.29276 of 2024

¶10

4.Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions and accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or the Police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that:

¶11

[a] if the petitioner fail to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled;

¶12

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police everyday at 10.30.a.m., for a period of one week and thereafter on every Saturday at 06.30 p.m until further orders.

¶13

Page No.2 of 4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

Crl.O.P.No.29276 of 2024

¶16

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶17

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶18

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

¶19

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

26.11.2024

sma

Page No.3 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

Crl.O.P.No.29276 of 2024

¶25

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

¶26

sma

¶27

Crl.O.P.No.29276 of 2024

¶28

26.11.2024

¶29

Page No.4 of 4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Chandrasekara Gurukkal v. State through the

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrasekara Gurukkal v. State through the

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devarajan Vs State Rep by

D.Elumalai Vs the State Represented by

Mohan @ Mohan Raj Vs the State Rep.by

Murugan Vs the State Rep by

Anbarasan Vs State Rep by

Vignesh Vicky Vs The State Rep by its