D.Arun Raghavendra v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
The court recorded that the respondent police had secured the third accused in the case, and noted the matter need not be listed again.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.28388 of 2023
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.
It is with much appreciation that I record the fact that the respondent / Inspector of Police, Team – XII, Bank Fraud Investigation Wing, C.C.B – I, Chennai, has secured the 3rd accused. Hence, this matter need not be listed again.
11.03.2024
smv
Parties & counsel
- respondent
Inspector of Police, Team-XII, Bank Fraud Investigation Wing, C.C.B-I, Chennai
Coram
C.V.Karthikeyan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court