Allowed

Malansha v. The Inspector Of Police

Madras HC22 Feb 2024CRL OP/4003/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail petition for offences arising from a dispute over borrowed money that escalated into violence. Court granted anticipatory bail with a bond, two sureties, daily reporting for two weeks, and standard non-tampering and non-absconding conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, identity verification and reporting conditions.

Malansha Vs The Inspector Of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.4003 of 2024

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.4003 of 2024

¶3

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.

¶4

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in Crime No.37 of 2024 registered by the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC.

¶5

It is stated that the petitioner had borrowed an amount from the defacto complainant and owing to such borrowing, there was a dispute which escalated into violence.

¶6

However, taking all the other factors into consideration this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the Judicial Magistrate, Cheyyar, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who

¶7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶8

Crl.O.P.No.4003 of 2024

¶9

intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶10

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶11

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

¶12

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶13

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶14

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala

¶15

[(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶17

2/4

¶18

Crl.O.P.No.4003 of 2024

¶19

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶20

22.02.2024

¶21

rjr

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

¶23

Crl.O.P.No.4003 of 2024

¶24

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

¶25

rjr

¶26

Crl.O.P.No.4003 of 2024

¶27

22.02.2024

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

Malansha v. The Inspector Of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Malansha v. The Inspector Of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Govindhasamy Vs the State Rep by

Sadikul Vs the State Rep.by Its

P.Balamurugan Vs State Rep by

M.Tamilmani Vs State Rep.by

Sathish Vs the State Rep by

Gopi @ Gopinathan Vs The Sub Inspector Of Police