Allowed

Sadikul v. the State Rep.by Its

Madras HC21 Feb 2024CRL OP/1309/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, A3 arrested for house-breaking and theft of gold coins and cash under Sections 457 and 380 IPC, sought regular bail. Court granted bail on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting, and conditions against absconding or tampering.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on executing a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, with conditions including daily reporting at 10.00 a.m. to respondent police.

Sadikul Vs the State Rep.by Its — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.1309 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 21.02.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

Crl.OP.No.1309 of 2024

Sadikul

...Petitioner

Vs.

State rep by its The Inspector of Police, Thirupapuliyur Police Station, Cuddalore District. (Cr.No.428 of 2023)

¶11

...Respondent

¶12

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in FIR in Crime No.428 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr. S. Abdul Khadhar

¶14

For Respondent : Mr.L. Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶15

ORDER

¶16

The petitioner/A3 who was arrested on 06.11.2023 seeks bail in

¶17

Crime No.428 of 2023 registered under Sections 457 and 380 of I.P.C pending before the respondent police.

¶18

1/5

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/5

¶20

Crl.O.P.No.1309 of 2024

¶21

2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant broke opened the door of the defacto complainant's showroom and robbed 6nos of 1 grams gold coin and cash Rs.2,91,720/-. The investigation has proceeded to substantial extent.

¶22

The main objected raised by the learned Government Advocate is that the petitioners are resident of West Bengal.

¶23

The learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo stating that for the petitioner his brother one Jamirul Sheik and his cousin brother Nurkalam Hossain will stand as blood sureties. Let the credentials of the sureties be verified by the the learned Judicial Magistrate.

¶24

5.Taking all the factors into consideration and the quantity of the contraband and the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners subject to the following conditions.

¶25

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/5

¶27

Crl.O.P.No.1309 of 2024

¶28

condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate III, Cuddalore and on further conditions that:

¶29

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶30

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders.

¶31

[c] the petitioner is directed to file a memo with the names of the two blood sureties at the time of executing sureties.

¶32

[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶33

[e] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶34

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/5

¶36

Crl.O.P.No.1309 of 2024

¶37

conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶38

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶39

21.02.2024

¶40

smn

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/5

¶42

Crl.O.P.No.1309 of 2024

¶43

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

¶44

smn

¶45

¶46

The Judicial Magistrate III, Cuddalore.

¶47

2.The Inspector of Police, Thirupapuliyur Police Station, Cuddalore District.

¶48

3.Central Prison, Cuddalore.

¶49

4.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.

¶50

Crl.OP.No.1309 of 2024

¶51

21.02.2024

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/5

Sadikul v. the State Rep.by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sadikul v. the State Rep.by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nesamani Vs State Rep.by

Gowtham Vs Sub Inspector of Police

Rebecca Roshini Nisha Vs State Rep by

Moorthy Vs State Rep by

Karnan Vs State Rep by

C.Maran Vs State Rep by