Hanestraj v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
Two-judge bench dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.7874 of 2024. The court refrained from considering the petition on merits and ordered a list date for the underlying Criminal Appeal.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition dismissed; Criminal Appeal listed after two weeks.
What the court decided
Crl.M.P.No.7874 of 2024
Crl.M.P.No.7874 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.675 of 2024
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND
M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.
Heard the learned Senior counsel the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents.
- We have perused the evidences of PW2, PW6, PW16, Accident
Register and the material objects recovered. PW2 is the husband of the deceased, who had taken the deceased to the hospital immediately after the occurrence. The deceased had orally informed about the occurrence and the commission of offence to her husband/PW2.
- The evidence of PW2 corroborates with PW6, who is the Ex.Counsellor at Thenimalai. These evidences cannot be construed as wholly unreliable.
- The learned Senior counsel for the petitioner would submit that there is
no linking evidence as far as the petitioner/A5 is concerned. However, the said ground is arguable with reference to the evidences as stated above. Therefore,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned judgment in the criminal appeal should be revisited by the court in the criminal miscellaneous petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Respondents
Coram
S.M.Subramaniam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court