Contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of a court auction sale order. The contemnor vacated the premises, handed over keys and approved the draft sale deed. The Court found no further action necessary and closed the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.2325 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated:20.12.2024
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Contempt Petition No.2325 of 2024
Mrs.C.S.Geethalakshmi .. Petitioner / Applicant No.1
/versus/
Mrs.R.Selvi
.. Respondent/ Respondent
Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeyed the Court auction sale process of the Hon'ble Court as per the order dated 22.10.2021 in A.No.2009 of 2020.
For Petitioner :Mr.Shivakumar For Respondent :Mr.M.Aloysius Raja Pragash
ORDER
In continuation of the order dated 20.11.2024, the Contemnor
has vacated the premises and reported the same to the petitioner/applicant
No.1.
Cont.P.No.2325 of 2024
(Judicial) has been received by the petitioner and the petitioner has inspected the premises and reported that the premises is vacant and he has taken possession of the same.
20.12.2024
Index:yes/no ari
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
Cont.P.No.2325 of 2024
ari
Cont.P.No.2325 of 2024
20.12.2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mrs.C.S.Geethalakshmi
Mrs.R.Selvi
G.Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
