Defendants in a partition suit sought cancellation of a settlement deed executed by the plaintiff. As the settlement deed was voluntarily cancelled, the court dismissed the application as infructuous with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.3283 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated:20.12.2024
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
A.No.3283 of 2024 in
C.S.No.240 of 2019
1.Mrs.C.S.Geethalakshmi
2.Mrs.Radhika Santhanakrishnan @ S.Radhika 3.Mrs.Vasanthi Udayasuryan
4.Ms.C.S.Sunitha
.. Applicants/ Defendants 1 to 4
/versus/
Mrs.R.Selvi
.. Respondent/Plaintiff
Application has been filed under Order XIV, Rule 8 of the O.S. Rules read with Section 8 of the Partition Act and Section 151 of CPC., praying to direct the respondent to cancel the above settlement deed dated 10.02.2023 registered as Document No.595 of 2023 in the Sub Registrar Office Mylapore executed in favour of her son R.Prashanth and duly registering the cancellation deed in the Sub-Registrar Office Mylapore as per law.
A.No.3283 of 2024
For Petitioners :Mr.Shivakumar For Respondent :Mr.M.Aloysius Raja Pragash
ORDER
In view of the voluntary cancellation of the settlement deed dated 10.02.2023, nothing survives in this application. Hence, this application is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
20.12.2024
Index:yes/no ari
A.No.3283 of 2024
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
ari
A.No.3283 of 2024 in
C.S.No.240 of 2019
20.12.2024
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mrs.C.S.Geethalakshmi
Mrs.Radhika Santhanakrishnan @ S.Radhika
Mrs.Vasanthi Udayasuryan
Ms.C.S.Sunitha
Mrs.R.Selvi
G.Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
