Allowed

Vijayalakshmi v. Dr.Sarasa Bharati and 2 Others

Madras HC19 Dec 2024OP/501/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Probate petition for Letters of Administration with Will annexed for the estate of a testatrix who bequeathed a Guindy property to her sister. The Will was proved through an attesting witness and consent affidavits of the other siblings; no caveat objections were received.

What did the court decide?

Letters of Administration with Will annexed granted with effect throughout Tamil Nadu, subject to Rs.25,000 security bond and filing inventory and accounts within six months and one year.

Vijayalakshmi Vs Dr.Sarasa Bharati and 2 Others — Succession and Inheritance | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

O.P.No.501 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated:19.12.2024

¶4

Coram

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

O.P.No.501 of 2023

Ms.Vijayalakshmi

.. Petitioner

/versus/

1.DrSarasa Bharati

2.Dr.Saroja Bharati

3.Mr.Varadarajan .. Respondents

¶13

Original Petition has been filed under Sections 232 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act read with Order XXV Rule 5 of the Original Side Rules to grant Letters of Administration with Will annexed, which may be granted to the petitioner as the sister/beneficiary under the Will dated 03.09.2020 to have effect limited to the State of Tamil Nadu.

¶14

For Petitioner :Mr.V.Kuberan for M/s Rank Associates For Respondents :Mr.Harshit S.Jain

¶15

1/7

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

O.P.No.501 of 2023

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This Original Petition has been filed under Section 232 and 276 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (Act No.XXXIX of 1925) to grant Letters of Administration under Section XXV, Rule 5 of the Original Side Rules in respect of the last Will and Testament of Ms.Rajalakshmi, who died on 20.09.2021.

¶20

Ms.Rajalakshmi, elder sister of the petitioner died on 20.09.2021 at

¶21

Chennai. In her lifetime, Ms.Rajalakshmi, along with her sisters brought a house site measuring one ground and 317 sq.ft., at Velachery Road, Guindy, Chennai under a sale deed dated 06.01.2004 registered as document No.60 of 2004 at SRO, Velacery. She has bequeathed the said property in favour of one of her sister Vijayalakshmi, who is the petitioner herein. The said Will has been attested by two witnesses one by name M.Dhanasekaran and another by name C.Suresh. On the death of Rajalakshmi, the Will has come into effect. Since no executor was appointed, the present application is filed

¶22

2/7

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

O.P.No.501 of 2023

¶25

for grant of Letters of Administration in the matter of last Will and Testament of Rajalakshmi, who died on 20.09.2021.

¶26

To prove her claim, the petitioner had graced the witness box as PW-1 and marked Ex.P1 to Ex.P8 and one of the attesting witness Mr.C.Suresh was examined as PW-2 and marked two documents as Ex.P9 and Ex.P10. Ex.P9 is his affidavit as attesting witness and Ex.P10 is the photocopy of his Aadhar card. Ex.P2 is the Will of the Testatrix dated 03.09.2020. One of the attesting witness by name Mr.C.Suresh, is the second attestator for the Will and he had identified the Will and signature of Rajalakshmi in the Will. He further deposed that on the date of executing the Will-Ex.P2, he, along with M.Dhanasekaran, saw Rajalakshmi affixing her signature to the Will and at the time of executing the Will she was in a sound state of mind and good health. The statutory requirement under Section 67 of BSA is complied with by examining PW-2, one of the attesting witnesses. The other siblings of Rajalakshmi are arrayed as respondents and they have filed consent affidavits for grant of Letters of

¶27

3/7

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

O.P.No.501 of 2023

¶30

Administration in favour of the petitioner. Paper publication inviting objection if any for grant of Letters of Administration in favour of the petitioner effected and the same is marked as Ex.P7 and Ex.P8. However, no objection to the caveat has been received from any quarter. Since the Will of Rajalakshmi Ex.P2 is proved in the manner known to law and the death

¶31

of Rajalakshmi is proved through her death certificate Ex.P3, all the persons who have likely to have interest in the property as found in Ex.P4 are shown

¶32

as respondents and they have no objection to grant Letters of Administration in favour of the petitioner.

¶33

4. In the result,

¶34

(i)This Original Petition is allowed and Letters of Administration to

¶35

be issued in favour of the petitioner in accordance with the Rules. Such Letters of Administration shall have effect throughout the State of Tamil Nadu.

¶36

(ii)The petitioner is directed to execute a security bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) in the name of the Assistant

¶37

4/7

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

O.P.No.501 of 2023

¶40

Registrar (Original Side-II) of this Court.

¶41

(iii)The petitioner is further directed to file an inventory of assets and

¶42

statement of accounts within a period of six months and one year respectively.

19.12.2024

Index:yes/no ari

Witnesses examined:-

PW-1 :Ms.Vijayalakshmi PW-2 :Mr.C.Suresh

¶47

Documents marked:

¶48

Ex.P1	Photocopy of the sale deed dated 06.01.2004.
Ex.P2	Original Will of the Testatrix dated 03.09.2020.
Ex.P3	Webcopy of death certificate of the Testatrix dated 11.10.2021.
Ex.P4	Original Relationahsip Certificate issued by theTahsildar, Velachery Taluk, dated 08.04.2022.
Ex.P5	Webcopy of the death certificate of Mr.R.Durairajan dated 18.01.2022.
Ex.P6	Webcopy of the death certificate of Ms.R.Padmavalli dated 29.12.2001.

¶49

5/7

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

	O.P.No.501 of 2023
Ex.P7	Original Newspaper publication issued in Trinity Mirror dated 04.04.2024.
Ex.P8	Original Newspaper publication issued in Makkal Kural dated 13.04.2024.
Ex.P9	PW-2's affidavit as attesting witness.
Ex.P10	Photocopy of PW-2 Aadhaar Card

¶52

19.12.2024

¶53

6/7

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

O.P.No.501 of 2023

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.

ari

O.P.No.501 of 2023

19.12.2024

7/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Vijayalakshmi v. Dr.Sarasa Bharati and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijayalakshmi v. Dr.Sarasa Bharati and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Varun Venkatesh Vs P.M.v.Srinivasan and 2 Others

L.Kirubakaran Vs Jaikumar and 4 others

Ramesh Vs State rep by

Harshini U Vs C.Arjun Raj

Troydon Scruville Vs C.Treasure Mary De'Costa

S.Madhu Sudhanan and another Vs K.S.Ravichandran and 3 others