Allowed

l.Jeslinyellow Mary v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC3 Oct 2024CMP(MD)/11624/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In CMP (MD) No. 11624 of 2024, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court considered a petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to set aside an order dated 04.10.2021. The court allowed the petition, implicitly restoring CMA(MD) No. 1325 of 2013, and dismissed the cost memo implication, effectively deciding in favor of the applicant.

What did the court decide?

The petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act allowing restoration of the appeal set aside the prior order.

l.Jeslinyellow Mary Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CMP(MD). No.11624 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Thursday, the Third day of October Two Thousand and Twenty Four PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CMP(MD). No.11624 of 2024 in CMA(MD) No.1325 of 2013

¶3

I.Jeslinyellow Mary

¶4

...Petitioner/Appellant

¶5

¶6

The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by Inspector of Police, Crime Branch, CBCID, Thiruvallur District.

¶7

... Respondent/Respondent

¶8

Prayer in CMP(MD) No.12974 of 2023:

¶9

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act., to set aside the order dated 04.10.2021 on the file of this Honourable Court and Restore the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in CMA(MD). No.1325 of 2013.

¶10

Prayer in CMA(MD) No.1325 of 2013:

¶11

The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 11 of Criminal Law Amendment Ordinance 1944, against the order passed by the Sessions Judge,Kanyakumari at Nagercoil, dismissing the application in CR.MP No.3705 of 2009 in Criminal Original Petition No.1 of 2009 dated 20.01.2011.

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ORDER:- This Petition coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the

¶13

1/3

¶14

CMP(MD). No.11624 of 2024

¶15

petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.S.Rajasekar, for M/s.Lajapathi Roy & Associates, Advocates for the Petitioner and of Mr.M.Muthumanikkam, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the Respondent, this Court made the following order:

¶16

“This Petition is filed to set aside the order of this Court dated

¶17

04.10.2021 and to restore the appeal in CMA(MD)No.1325 of 2013.

¶18

2.Cost memo filed in terms of the order of this Court dated

¶19

31.07.2024. Hence, this petition is allowed.”

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar (CS-I )

¶22

// True Copy //

¶23

/12/2024 Sub Assistant Registrar (CS- I, II, III, IV)

¶24

apd

¶25

¶26

1.The Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

¶27

2.The Inspector of Police, Crime Branch, CBCID, Thiruvallur District.

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

2/3

¶30

CMP(MD). No.11624 of 2024

¶31

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶32

Copy to:

¶33

The Section Officer, Judicial Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶34

ORDER DATED: 03/10/2024

¶35

=========================

¶36

ORDER

¶37

========================= CMP(MD)No.11624 of 2024

¶38

¶39

CMA(MD) No.1325 of 2013

¶40

Giving direction and etc.

¶41

as stated within.

¶42

RD(05/12/2024) 3 P / 5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17.07.2023.

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

3/3

l.Jeslinyellow Mary v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

l.Jeslinyellow Mary v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Joseph Vs Rajayya

S.George Selvin Manohar Vs P.Chinna Rani Siriya Pushpam

Muthumari Vs Shemi Mohamed Sham

Muthunatchi Vs Chinna Murugan

M/S.Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co.Ltd., Vs Puniyamoorthi

A.Balachandran, Vs B. Moovendran