Joseph v. Rajayya
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a brief mention order dismissing a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, due to the appellant's default in appearing before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as default.
What the court decided
C.M.A.(MD)No.246 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 01.10.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
C.M.A(MD)No.246 of 2013
Joseph
... Appellant/Claimant
Vs.
1.Rajayyan 2.Rajendran 3.United India Insurance Company Ltd., Rep. By its Branch Manager, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District.
- Orient Insurance Company Ltd., Rep. By its Branch Manager, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. ...Respondents/Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the fair and decreetal order made in M.C.O.P.No.5 of 2005 dated 18.06.2007 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (Principal Sub Court), Kuzhithurai.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Joseph
- respondent
Rajayyan
- respondent
Rajendran
- respondent
United India Insurance Company Ltd.
- respondent
Orient Insurance Company Ltd.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court