The Madras High Court dismissed an appeal against the Commissioner's dismissal of a compensation claim. The Court upheld the finding that the claimants failed to prove an employer-employee relationship, noting the absence of documentary evidence and witness credibility.
The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was dismissed. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.A.(MD) No.1270 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.10.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
C.M.A.(MD) No.1270 of 2023
1.A.Balachandran S/o.Ayyankalai
2.B.Lakshmi W/o.A.Balachandran ... Appellants
Vs.
1.B.Moovendran
S/o.Boss
2.Branch Manager, New India Assurance Company Ltd., Rosari Church Building, 2nd Floor, No.61, Town Hall Road, Madurai - 625 001.
... Respondents
Prayer:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 30 of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 15.05.2023 made in E.C.No.81 of 2022 on the file of the Commissioner for Employee's Compensation/Joint Commissioner of Labour, Madurai, to set aside the same and consequently to direct the second respondent to pay a compensation for a sum of Rs.15,00,000/with interest and cost.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ Page No. 1 of 6_
C.M.A.(MD) No.1270 of 2023
For Appellants : Mr.V.Sasikumar For R1 : No appearance For R2 : Mr.V.Sakthivel
J U D G M E N T
The instant appeal challenges the dismissal of the claim petition filed by the appellants before the Commissioner.
stating that the deceased was working as a driver under the first respondent, and that on 21.02.2022, at about 4:45 p.m., while the deceased was driving a car bearing registration No.TN-84-Z-1111, which belonged to the first respondent, another car bearing registration No.TN-60-AJ-3454 came from the opposite direction in a rash and negligent manner and collided with the car driven by the deceased, after which a tempo traveller bearing registration No.KL-32-G-5341, which was coming behind the car bearing registration No.TN-60-AJ-3454, also collided with the car driven by the deceased, as a result of which the deceased sustained fatal injuries.
____________ Page No. 2 of 6_
C.M.A.(MD) No.1270 of 2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ Page No. 3 of 6_
C.M.A.(MD) No.1270 of 2023
confidence to hold that the deceased was employed by the first respondent. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the factual finding rendered by the Commissioner cannot be faulted.
costs.
03.10.2024
Index: Yes/ No Neutral Citation: Yes / No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order
JEN
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ Page No. 4 of 6_
C.M.A.(MD) No.1270 of 2023
Copy To:
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ Page No. 5 of 6_
C.M.A.(MD) No.1270 of 2023
SUNDER MOHAN, J.
JEN
C.M.A.(MD) No.1270 of 2023
03.10.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ Page No. 6 of 6_
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the claimants failed to establish an employee-employer relationship required for compensation under the Employers’ Liability Act.
Whether the factual finding by the Commissioner dismissing the compensation claim based on lack of evidence is sustainable.
Whether the appellants have pursued other potentially liable vehicle owners despite involvement in the accident.
A. Balachandran S/o Ayyankalai and B. Lakshmi W/o A. Balachandran
B. Moovendran S/o Boss
New India Assurance Company Ltd.
Sunder Mohan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
