Shanth v. Meenambal
Case brief
What is this about?
Application to implead the Sundarathammal Dharmachatiram Charitable Trust as respondent in an appeal over partition of property, following remand by the Supreme Court. The proposed party raised no objection, and the impleadment application was allowed.
What the court decided
C.M.P.No.1109 of 2024
C.M.P.No.1109 of 2016 in A.S.No.441 of 2002
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
Mr.A.Muthukumar, learned counsel filed vakkalat for the Petitioner, who
is the Plaintiff in the Suit.
2.C.M.P.No.1109 of 2016 has been filed to implead the 15th Respondent
herein as 10th Respondent in the above Appeal.
3.By an earlier order dated 04.07.2024, the following order was passed by this Court:
“ 2.By an order dated 13.02.2024, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos.2163-2165 of 2024 has passed the following order:
“Be that as it may, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order. Since the High Court has not gone into the merits, but has merely held that the Trust is also entitled to be heard as a party Respondent.
The impugned order is accordingly set aside to be heard afresh, which would mean hearing of A.S.No.441 of 2002 and Cross Objection No.80/2002 after deciding the Petition filed in C.M.P.No.1109/2016. Hence, the matter stands remitted back to the High Court.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Should the Sundarathammal Dharmachatiram Charitable Trust be impleaded as a party in A.S.No.441 of 2002?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner (Plaintiff in the Suit)
- applicant
Sundarathammal Dharmachatiram and Charitable Trust
Coram
RMT.Teekaa Raman
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court