L. Mahendhiran v. v. Chandran
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against a trial court decree was listed with no representation for the appellant, whose legal aid counsel nomination had been withdrawn. The High Court dismissed the appeal suit for default, with no costs.
What the court decided
A.S.No.580 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.06.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
A.S.No.580 of 2016
L.Mahendhiran ... Appellant
...Versus...
1.V.Chandran 2.Manjula Chandran 3.N.Ramesh Kumar ...Respondents PRAYER: This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.7800 of 2011 dated 24.02.2016 on the file of the learned IV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Appellant :: No appearance For R1 & R2 :: No appearance For R3 :: Mr.K.Rajasekaran
1/3
Parties & counsel
- appellant
L.Mahendhiran
- respondent
V.Chandran
- respondent
Manjula Chandran
- respondent
N.Ramesh Kumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court