The court allowed applications to admit additional evidence despite opposition regarding delay, subject to the payment of a fee. This interim order addresses the procedural aspect of admitting proofs in insolvency proceedings.
Applications allowed on condition of payment of Rs. 25,000/- on each application before 07.08.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Application (IP) Nos. 201, 202, 95 and 96 of 2024 in I.P. No. 25 of 2014
Application (IP) Nos. 201, 202, 95 and 96 of 2024 in I.P. No. 25 of 2014
Dr. G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. and C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
These applications have been filed allowing the applicant
herein to let in evidence by filing his proof affidavits in Application Nos. 53 and 54 of 2017 in I.P. No. 25 of 2014 and to receive the documents found in the list of documents to the present judges summons, as evidence along with the proof affidavits on the side of the second respondent in A. No. 53 of 2017 in I.P. No. 25 of 2014.
Page 1 of 3
Application (IP) Nos. 201, 202, 95 and 96 of 2024 in I.P. No. 25 of 2014
records substantially support the submissions made by the learned
counsel appearing for the Official Assignee, this Court is of the view in order to afford opportunity to the respondent, who is facing recovery proceedings, these applications are allowed on condition to pay a sum of Rs. 25,000/- on each application on or before 07.08.2024.
[Dr. G.J., J.] [C.V.K., J.] 10.07.2024
Page 2 of 3
Application (IP) Nos. 201, 202, 95 and 96 of 2024 in I.P. No. 25 of 2014
Dr. G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. and C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
Maya
Application (IP) Nos. 201, 202, 95 and 96 of 2024 in I.P. No. 25 of 2014
10.07.2024
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the applicant to file additional evidence and documents to delay the pending recovery proceedings.
Dr. G. Jayachandran
C. V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
