The petition to condone a substantial delay in setting aside an ex parte execution order was dismissed as the court found no merit in the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appln. No. 190 of 2024 in I.P. No. 25 of 2014
Dr. G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. and
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
The petitioner herein, who is the judgement debtor, is continuously evading the service of notice by changing his name and address. Now after issuance of warrant of arrest, this petition is filed to condone the delay of 1806 days in filing the set-aside exparte order in Application (IP) No. 239 of 2016 dated 12.07.2019.
application seeking condonation of delay and hence, the same is dismissed.
[Dr. G.J.J.,] [C.V.K., J.] 10.07.2024
Maya
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 1806 days in filing an application to set aside an ex parte order is condonable?
Judgement Debtor
Dr. G. Jayachandran
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
