Applications in a suit to condone 690 days' delay, set aside abatement caused by the death of the second plaintiff, and bring the deceased plaintiff's legal representatives on record as plaintiffs. Defendants raised no objection; all three applications were allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A Nos.6211, 6212 and 6213 of 2024 in T.O.S No.38 of 2011
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
These three applications have been filed by the applicants/plaintiffs, i) to condone the delay of 690 days in filing the application to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 2nd plaintiff viz., M.K.Muthamil Selvam ii) to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 2nd plaintiff and iii) to bring on record the respondents 8 to 10 viz., 1.M.Rajakumar, 2.M.Murali and 3.M.Priya as plaintiffs 8, 9 and 10, who are the legal representatives of the deceased 2nd plaintiff, in the above suit.
in allowing these three applications.
support of the applications, these three applications are allowed.
amendment.
05.12.2024
uma
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
uma
A Nos.6211, 6212 & 6213 of 2024 in T.O.S No.38 of 2011
05.12.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Should the delay of 690 days in filing the application to set aside abatement be condoned and the legal representatives be brought on record?
M.K.Muthamil Selvam
Applicants/Plaintiffs
Respondents/Defendants
A.A.Nakkiran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
