A contempt petition alleging violation of an interim order was settled: the fourth petitioner and fourteenth respondent filed a joint compromise memo, which the court recorded and closed the petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.803 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04.12.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN,J. Contempt Petition No.803 of 2019
1/4
Cont.P.No.803 of 2019
PRAYER : Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, to punish the respondents for violating/not obeying the order dated 22.02.2016 passed in OA.No.1253 of 2015 in the above suit on the file of this court.
For Petitioners : Mr.Umashankar For Respondents : M/s.T.Dharani for R14
O R D E R
When this matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel
for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel for the 14th respondent submitted that this matter has been compromised between the 4th petitioner and 14th respondent. Pursuant to the same, they have filed a Joint Compromise Memo dated 04.12.2024 which has been duly signed by their respective counsel.
2/4
Cont.P.No.803 of 2019
No costs.
04.12.2024
Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order gv
A.A.NAKKIRAN,J.
3/4
Cont.P.No.803 of 2019
gv
Contempt Petition No.803 of 2019
04.12.2024
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Zahara Begum (deceased)
Syed Shafiullah
Syed Rafifullah (died)
Syed Namath
P.Veeramani
Kannappa
A.A.Nakkiran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
