The single-judge court allowed applications to condone a 292-day delay, set aside abatement, and bring legal representatives of a deceased defendant on record as new parties in the suit.
Applications allowed; legal representatives brought on record as defendants 18 and 19; pleadings directed to be amended.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A Nos.6316, 6317 and 6318 of 2024 in
T.O.S No.2 of 2008
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
These three applications have been filed by the applicants/plaintiffs, i) to
condone the delay of 292 days in filing the application to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 5th defendant, ii) to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 5th defendant and iii) to bring on record Mrs.Kanagalatha and Mr.Ganesh as legal representatives of the deceased 5th defendant and array them as defendants 18 &19 in the above suit.
support of the applications, these three applications are allowed.
amendment.
04.12.2024
uma
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
uma
A Nos.6316, 6317 & 6318 of 2024 in T.O.S No.2 of 2008
04.12.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 292 days in condoning abatement due to the death of a defendant should be condoned and legal representatives brought on record.
Applicants
Respondents
A.A.Nakkiran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
