The court allowed an application to set aside an order rejecting the plaint for non-payment of court fee and dismissed suit for non-prosecution, restoring the suit upon fee payment.
Application allowed; suit restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.6009 of 2024 in T.O.S No.80 of 2013
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
This application has been filed by the applicants/plaintiffs to set aside the order dated 27.03.2023 passed by the learned Master in T.O.S No.80 of 2023, wherein the plaint was rejected for non payment of court fee and suit was dismissed for non prosecution.
3.The learned counsel for the applicants/plaintiffs submitted that he has paid the court fee and hence, he prays to allow this application.
21.11.2024
uma
Note: Post on 28.11.2024.
Applicants/Plaintiffs
Respondent
A.A.NAKKIRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
