The application sought leave to institute a suit against a respondent residing outside jurisdiction. The Court held that since promissory notes were executed and the major cause of action arose within the Court's jurisdiction, leave is granted.
Leave to institute the suit before this Court is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.50 of 2024
N.SATHISH KUMAR. J,
This application has been filed seeking leave to sue the respondent/ defendant by instituting the suit before this Court.
05.01.2024
vrc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to file a suit against a respondent residing outside jurisdiction is grantable when promissory notes were executed and major cause of action arose within jurisdiction.
N.SATHISH KUMAR
Respondent
N.SATHISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
