Disposed

Subramanian R v. The District Registrar

Madras HC12 Oct 2023WP(MD)/9125/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court in a writ petition directed the District Registrar to consider the petitioner's representation alleging fraudulent execution of documents after a preliminary decree in a partition suit, passing a final order after putting other respondents on notice within ten weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the first respondent to pass a final order on the representation after putting respondents 3 and 4 on notice within ten weeks.

Subramanian R Vs The District Registrar — Partition | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.9125 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 12.10.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.9125 of 2022

R.Subramanian

... Petitioner

1.The District Registrar, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

¶11

2.The Sub Registrar, Kadayanallur Sub Registrar Office, Kadayanallur,

¶12

Tenkasi District.

¶13

3.K.V.K.Saravana Kumaravel

¶14

4.K.V.K.Sivakumar

¶15

(R.3 and R.4 are impleaded vide Court order dated 13.06.2022) ... Respondents

¶16

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.04.2022 and take appropriate action based on the same, within the time frame fixed by this Court

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

1/4

¶19

W.P(MD)No.9125 of 2022

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gokul For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader for R.1 and R.2 Mr.Ka.Ramakrishnan for R.3 and R.4

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Heard both sides.

¶23

The writ petitioner is the nephew of one Kanthaiya Konar. The petitioner had filed partition suit against Kanthaiya Konar in O.S.No.75 of 2001 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi. Preliminary decree was passed on 17.07.2006. A.S.No.17 of 2008 filed by Kanthaiya Konar was dismissed by the Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli on 28.06.2010. The Second Appeal had also suffered dismissal. In the meanwhile, Kanthaiya Konar had executed the petition mentioned documents in favour of his sons, namely, K.V.K.Saravana Kumaravel and K.V.K.Sivakumar (respondents 3 and 4 herein) in the year 2019. Seeking its cancellation, the petitioner filed a petition before the first respondent. The first respondent may not have the power to cancel the document. But then he can very well label it as fraudulent. Kanthaiya Konar could not have executed the petitioned mentioned documents in favour of his sons when he had already suffered a preliminary decree in the partition suit. It

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

2/4

¶26

W.P(MD)No.9125 of 2022

¶27

was also alleged by the petitioner that Kanthaiya Konar had executed in excess of what he was actually entitled to.

¶28

The first respondent will bear these observations in mind and pass final order on the petition mentioned representation after putting the respondents 3 and 4 on notice. Such order shall be passed by the first respondent within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶29

This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶30

12.10.2023

¶31

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No

¶32

MGA

¶33

¶34

1.The District Registrar, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

¶35

2.The Sub Registrar, Kadayanallur Sub Registrar Office, Kadayanallur, Tenkasi District.

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

3/4

¶38

W.P(MD)No.9125 of 2022

¶39

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶40

MGA

¶41

W.P(MD)No.9125 of 2022

¶42

12.10.2023

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

Subramanian R v. The District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subramanian R v. The District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Omnath.T.v Vs the District Registrar (Administration)

Ponnusamy Vs the Inspector General of Registration

M/S. Jayavilas Subbaraj Spinning Mills P Ltd. Vs Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution

Thangakodi P Vs Deputy Inspector General of Registrartion Office

Maheswari Vs The Tahsildar

Rajendran.N Vs The Sub Registrar