The Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Maheswari against the Tahsildar, Dindigul, as the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.2719 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 12.10.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P(MD)No.2719 of 2023
Maheswari
... Petitioner
Vs.
The Tahsildar, O/o. The Tahsildar Office, Dindigul East, Dindigul District. ... Respondent
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.3260/2022/A1 dated 21.01.2023 and set aside the same consequently direct the respondent to issue combined certificate to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Karuna
For Respondent : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
W.P(MD)No.2719 of 2023
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
rmi
costs.
12.10.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi
To
The Tahsildar, O/o. The Tahsildar Office, Dindigul East, Dindigul District.
W.P(MD)No.2719 of 2023
12.10.2023
Maheswari
The Tahsildar, O/o. The Tahsildar Office, Dindigul East, Dindigul District
G.R.SWAMINATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
