Dismissed

Ponnusamy v. the Inspector General of Registration

Madras HC11 Oct 2023WP(MD)/2167/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In the absence of the petitioner, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed this writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking an enquiry for cancellation of a sale deed. The Court directed the petitioner to pursue remedies in an earlier pending civil suit.

What did the court decide?

None. The Court directed the petitioner to pursue remedies in the pending civil suit.

Ponnusamy Vs the Inspector General of Registration — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.2167 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 11.10.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.2167 of 2022

Ponnusamy

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Inspector General of Registration, No. 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 28.

¶11

2.The Deputy Registrar, Collector Office Old Building, Kokkirakulam, Tirunelveli.

¶12

3.The District Registrar,

¶13

57, Railway Feeder Road, Near New Bus Stand, RTO Complex, Tenkasi.

¶14

4.Mariraj

¶15

5.Gopalakrishnan

¶16

6.Kaliappan @ Kalimuthu

¶17

7.Ramaraja

¶18

8.Balakrishnaprabhu

¶19

1/6

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

W.P(MD)No.2167 of 2022

¶22

9.Thasaratharamachandran

10.Rajeshwari

11.Sivasakthi

12.Kaniraj

13.Sankar

14.Palkani

15.Dakshinamoorthy

... Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing 2nd Respondent to conduct the enquiry with regard to cancellation of sale deed based on forged and fabricated documents with impersonation, registered at the office of 4th Respondent office, on the basis on the Petitioner's Representation dated 15-11-2021.

¶31

For Petitioner : No appearance

¶32

For Respondents : Mr.S.RA.Ramachandran,

¶33

Addl. Government Pleader for R1 to R3. Mr.Shyllappakalyan for R9, R14 and R15. No appearance for R4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 & 13.

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

2/6

¶36

W.P(MD)No.2167 of 2022

¶37

ORDER

¶38

None appeared for the writ petitioner on the last occasion. The case is listed under the caption “for dismissal” today ie., 11.10.2023. Even today also, there is no representation for the petitioner.

¶39

2.The petitioner wants this Court to direct the District Registrar to conduct enquiry for cancelling the petition mentioned sale deed.

¶40

3.The learned counsel for the respondents 9, 14 and 15 informs the Court that the petitioner had earlier filed O.S.No.344 of 2021 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi seeking the relief of declaration and permanent injunction in respect of the petition mentioned property. The rights of the parties will abide by the outcome of the said suit. It is open to the petitioner herein to move the authorities concerned based on the outcome of the civil suit. The petitioner can very well pursue his remedy in the pending suit. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter.

¶41

3/6

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

W.P(MD)No.2167 of 2022

¶44

4.This writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations.

¶45

No costs.

¶46

11.10.2023

¶47

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias

¶48

To:-

¶49

1.The Inspector General of Registration, No. 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 28.

¶50

2.The Deputy Registrar, Collector Office Old Building, Kokkirakulam, Tirunelveli.

¶51

3.The District Registrar, 57, Railway Feeder Road, Near New Bus Stand, RTO Complex, Tenkasi.

¶52

4/6

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶54

W.P(MD)No.2167 of 2022

¶55

5/6

¶56

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶57

W.P(MD)No.2167 of 2022

¶58

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶59

ias

¶60

W.P(MD)No.2167 of 2022

¶61

11.10.2023

¶62

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶63

6/6

Ponnusamy v. the Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ponnusamy v. the Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagarathinam M Vs The District Collector

Thiagarajar Mills Pvt. Limited, Vs The Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd. (Tangedco)

Dhanushkodi. S Vs The District Registrar (Admin)

Omnath.T.v Vs the District Registrar (Administration)

M/S. Jayavilas Subbaraj Spinning Mills P Ltd. Vs Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution

Amirtham G Vs the District Registrar