Chinnakanni v. The Director
Case brief
What is this about?
By consent, the Court fixed a timeline for the EPFO and employer to obtain missing details from the employer and disburse deceased employee's benefits to the petitioner within eight weeks. The petition allowed.
What did the court decide?
The 1st respondent to approach the 2nd respondent for details; the 2nd respondent to furnish details; the amount to be disbursed to the petitioner within eight weeks.
What the court decided
W.P.(MD).No.8543 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 17.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
W.P.(MD)No. 8543 of 2023
Chinnakanni
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Director, Employee Provident Fund Organization, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan, Lady Doak College Road, Madurai.
- The Manager, TVS Sundaram Industries Private Limited, Tyre Solution Division, Coimbatore
... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's application, dated 05.03.2023 and to disburse the employee benefits of deceased Vijay (petitioner's son) within a stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition directing EPFO to disburse deceased employee benefits can be disposed of by consent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Chinnakanni
- respondent
The Director, Employee Provident Fund Organization
- respondent
The Manager, TVS Sundaram Industries Private Limited
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court