Allowed

Pl. Kalaimathi v. the Dist. Collector

Madras HC17 Apr 2023WMP(MD)/3229/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, through Justice S. Srinath, allowed a Special Writ Petition (MD) No.3229 of 2020, which prayed for condonation of a 705-day delay in restoring WP(MD) No.14843 of 2010. The petition sought to quash proceedings and secure employment priority. The court ordered condonation upon payment of fees to the Siddha Clinic.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed upon payment of ₹750 to the Siddha Clinic; Registry directed to number the restoration petition if in order.

Pl. Kalaimathi Vs the Dist. Collector — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

WMP(MD) No.3229 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Special Original Jurisdiction )

¶4

Monday, the Seventeenth day of April Two Thousand and Twenty Three

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice S.SRIMATHY

¶7

WMP(MD) No.3229 of 2020 IN

¶8

WP(MD) No.14843 of 2010

¶9

PL.KALAIMATHI

¶10

... PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶11

¶12

1 THE DISRICT COLLECTOR COLLECTORATE OFFICE, SIVAGANGAI.

¶13

2 THE SUB COLLECTOR

¶14

DEVAKOTTAI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶15

3 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DEVAKOTTAI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶16

4 THE TAHSILDAR

¶17

KARAIKUDI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶18

5 THE COMMISSIONER

¶19

KALLAL PANCHAYAT UNION, KARAIKUDI TALUK, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶20

6 THE DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT OFFICER SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT SIVAGANGAI. ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶21

Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 705 days in filing the application for restoration of the Writ petition in WP(MD).No.14843/2010 dated 0502-2018, on the file of this Honourable Court.

¶22

Prayer in WP(MD). 14843/ 2010 :

¶23

To issue a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS, calling for the records relating to the proceedings made in Oo.Mu.No.A2/10551/10 dated 2010-2010 passed by the 4th Respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to issue Employment Priority https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

1/3

¶25

WMP(MD) No.3229 of 2020

¶26

Certificate under the caption for persons affected due to Land Acquired for Government Purposes and further direction directing the 6th Respondent to sponsor the Petitioner's name in the priority basis against the existing vacancies.

¶27

ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.P.R.PRITHVIRAJ, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.M.LINGADURAI, Special Government Pleader on behalf of the Respondents, the court made the following order:-

¶28

This Petition is allowed on payment of Rs.750/-(Rupees Seven Hundred Fifty only) by the Petitioner to SIDDHA CLINIC attached to Madurai Bench of Madras High Court.

¶29

On such payment, Registry is directed to number the Restoration petition, if it is otherwise in order.

¶30

/04/2023

¶31

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶32

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶33

KSA/NSR

¶34

¶35

1 THE DISRICT COLLECTOR COLLECTORATE OFFICE, SIVAGANGAI.

¶36

2 THE SUB COLLECTOR DEVAKOTTAI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶37

3 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DEVAKOTTAI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶38

4 THE TAHSILDAR KARAIKUDI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶39

5 THE COMMISSIONER KALLAL PANCHAYAT UNION, KARAIKUDI TALUK, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶40

6 THE DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT OFFICER SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT, SIVAGANGAI.

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

2/3

¶43

WMP(MD) No.3229 of 2020

¶44

COPY TO:

¶45

1 THE SECTION OFFICER, WRIT SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶46

2 THE MEDICAL OFFICER, SIDDHA CLINIC, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶47

ORDER IN WMP(MD) No.3229 of 2020 IN WP(MD) No.14843 of 2010 Date :17/04/2023 SA/MMS/SAR.4/18.04.2023/3P/9C

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

3/3

Pl. Kalaimathi v. the Dist. Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pl. Kalaimathi v. the Dist. Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Sree Thangaraj Vs Mr.M.Arvind

Paramasivam, Vs Ramesh

S.S.Rahmathullah, Vs K.P.Karthikeyan, I.A.S.

P.Jeevarani Vs The Assistant Director (Audit)

Chinnakanni Vs The Director

R.Suresh Kanna Vs The Principal Secretary to Tamil nadu