Paramasivam, v. Ramesh
Case brief
What is this about?
This contempt petition alleged wilful disobedience of an order fixing revised pension. The court held there was no contempt since a proposal for revised calculation was submitted. It directed full compliance within 12 weeks.
What did the court decide?
Compliance with the December 3, 2018 order directed within twelve weeks.
What the court decided
Cont.P.(MD).No.332 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 13.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
Cont.P.(MD).No.332 of 2023 In W.P.(MD).No.22635 of 2018
Paramasivam
... Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
Thiru Ramesh, The District Education Officer, District Education Office (DEO), Puthukkotai District.
... Contemnor/Respondent
PRAYER: Petition filed under under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor for wilfully disobeying and not complying with the order of this Court, dated 03.12.2018, in W.P.(MD).No.22635 of 2018.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the failure to comply with the court's order to fix revised pension constitutes wilful disobedience.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Paramasivam
- respondent
Thiru Ramesh
Coram
S. Srinathy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court