Disposed

Duraibalan v. The District Collector

Madras HC5 Jul 2023WP(MD)/5912/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Revenue Divisional Officer to dispose of a patta appeal within four months. The Court impleaded two additional respondents and fixed the disposal timeline while noting a pending suit in District Munsif Court.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent (Revenue Divisional Officer) to conclude the appeal proceedings within four months after providing sufficient opportunity to respondents 4 & 5.

Duraibalan Vs The District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

WP(MD)No.5912 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 05.07.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

WP.(MD).No.5912 of 2023

Duraibalan

... Petitioner

1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

¶11

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

¶12

3.The Tahsildar, Rajapalayam Taluk Office, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.

¶13

R.Lakshumanan

¶14

5.A.Karuppaiah ... Respondents

¶15

(R4 and R5 are impleaded as per the order of this Court in WMP(MD) No.8453 of 2023 and WMP(MD) No.7631 of 2023 by BPJ)

¶16

1/6

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Prayer:

¶19

WP(MD)No.5912 of 2023

¶20

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent No.2 to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner on 12.01.2023, which was submitted under the patta pass book Act, 1983 within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Karunanidhi For R1 to R3 : Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader For R4 : Mr.M.Jothi Basu M/s.Sivajla

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

The petitioner has filed an appeal before the second respondent /the Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi as against the orders of the Tahsildar granting patta in favour of the fourth respondent with regard to the land in Survey No.265/1, 288/2 on 12.01.2023 and he has approached this Court for a Mandamus, directing the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's appeal within a stipulated time.

¶24

2.On the directions of this Court, the petitioner has filed an impleading petition to implead the aggrieved party in whose name the 2/6

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

WP(MD)No.5912 of 2023

¶27

patta stands and accordingly, WMP(MD) No.8453 of 2023 is filed to implead one R.Lakshumanan as the fourth respondent in this writ petition. In view of the above, WMP(MD) No.8453 of 2023 is ordered. R.Lakshumanan is impleaded as the fourth respondent in this writ petition.

¶28

3.One A.Karuppaiah has also filed another application WMP(MD) No.7631 of 2023 to implead him as a party to this writ petition stating that he is a Nattanmai of Devendirakula Velalar Uravinmurai (Kallamayan Vakaiyara) Sundararajapuram Village. However, the petitioner has filed this writ petition claiming to be one Veerappan, a representative of Sundararajapuram Village. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has raised serious objections for allowing WMP(MD) No.7631 of 2023. In order to give quietus to this issue, the said Karuppaiah also was impleaded as a party to this writ petition. Accordingly, WMP(MD) No.7631 of 2023 is ordered. A.Karuppaiah is impleaded as the fifth respondent in this writ petition. 3/6

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

WP(MD)No.5912 of 2023

¶31

4.The learned Special Government Pleader, who takes

¶32

notice for the respondents 1 to 3 submits that with regard to this issue a suit in O.S.No.25 of 2023 is pending before the District Munsif Court, Rajapalayam.

¶33

5.Considering the fact that the appeal preferred by the petitioner on 12.01.2023 is still pending, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to conclude the appeal proceedings after providing sufficient opportunity to the respondents 4 & 5, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶34

05.07.2023 (3/3)

¶35

NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet: Yes vrn

¶36

4/6

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

WP(MD)No.5912 of 2023

¶39

¶40

1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

¶41

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

¶42

3.The Tahsildar, Rajapalayam Taluk Office, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.

¶43

5/6

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

WP(MD)No.5912 of 2023

¶46

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶47

vrn

¶48

Order made in WP.(MD).No.5912 of 2023

¶49

05.07.2023 (3/3)

¶50

6/6

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Duraibalan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Duraibalan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravaneeswaran D Vs the District Revenue Officer

J.K.M.Solrad Entech Private Limited, Vs The Tahsildar

Princy Vs The District Collector

Arun Kumaran Vs The Deputy Registrar /

M.Kamatchi Vs The Thasildar

Ashok Kumar. R Vs The Registrar of Co-operative Societies