M.Kamatchi v. The Thasildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought mandamus directing authorities to survey agricultural land. Court directed survey after issuing notice to other pattadars within 12 weeks.
What did the court decide?
Directed respondents to conduct survey within 12 weeks after issuing notice to other pattadars.
What the court decided
WP(MD)No.14118 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 05.07.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
WP(MD)No.14118 of 2023
M.Kamatchi
... Petitioner
Vs
1.The Tahsildar, Dindigul East Tahsildar Office, Dindigul District.
2.The Taluk Surveyor, Koonapatti Village Administrative Office, Sanarpatti Village, Dindigul East, Dindigul District. ...Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to carry out survey, measurement and demarcation of boundaries of the agricultural land measuring to an extent of 0.24.00 Hectares, comprised in Survey No.53/6 A1 situate at Konapatti Village,
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents are directed to conduct a survey based on the petitioner's document after issuing notice to other pattadars.
If the petitioner can obtain a survey despite the patta being in the names of others.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Kamatchi
- respondent
Tahsildar, Dindigul East Tahsildar Office, Dindigul District
- respondent
Taluk Surveyor, Koonapatti Village Administrative Office, Sanarpatti Village, Dindigul East, Dindigul District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court