Disposed

Venkatesh R S v. The District Collector

Madras HC10 Feb 2023WP(MD)/2752/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed the second respondent to dispose of the petitioners' representation for land re-classification on merits and in accordance with law within twelve weeks, without adjudicating the merits of the matter itself.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to dispose of the representation on merits within twelve weeks.

Venkatesh R S Vs The District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.2752 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 10.02.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.2752 of 2023

¶7

1.R.S.Venkatesh

¶8

2.R.S.Dinesh Babu ... Petitioners

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.The District Collector, Collector Office, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.

¶11

2.The Tasildhar, Taluk Office, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi Taluk, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to remove the classification of Government Purampokku in their records with regard to the property admeasuring 58.33 cents situated at Town Survey No.4135/1, subdivided as T.S.No.4135/1L, Polnaickenpettai, Thoothukudi

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/4

¶15

W.P(MD)No.2752 of 2023

¶16

Town, Thoothukudi Taluk, Thoothukudi District and change it in the name of the petitioners on the basis of the petitioners' representation dated 19.12.2022

¶17

within stipulated time.

¶18

For Petitioners : Mr.B.Rajesh Saravanan

¶19

For Respondents : Mr.A.K.Manikkam, Spl. Government Pleader.

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶22

2.The petitioners have given a representation dated 19.12.2022 to the

¶23

second respondent seeking re-classification of the petition mentioned land. They want it to be expeditiously considered.

¶24

3.No exception can be taken to the said request. The second respondent is directed to dispose of the petition mentioned representation on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. The second respondent shall put the interested persons, if any, on notice

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

2/4

¶27

W.P(MD)No.2752 of 2023

¶28

before passing final order. It is open to the second respondent to pass order one way or the other.

¶29

4.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶30

10.02.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias

¶31

To:

¶32

1.The District Collector, Collector Office, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.

¶33

2.The Tasildhar, Taluk Office, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

3/4

¶36

W.P(MD)No.2752 of 2023

¶37

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶38

ias

¶39

W.P(MD)No.2752 of 2023

¶40

10.02.2023 (2/2)

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

4/4

Venkatesh R S v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Venkatesh R S v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kottaisamy.M Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Sivajirajan Vs The Secretary to Government

Periyadurai Vs The District Registrar (Admin)

Ravi R Vs The District Revenue Officer

Sureshkumar S Vs The Branch Manager

Srividya Vs The District Collector