Allowed

Periyadurai v. The District Registrar (Admin)

Madras HC9 Feb 2023WP(MD)/772/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged refusal check slip denying registration of a partition deed executed based on an unregistered will. Court set aside refusal, directed authority to verify genuineness, and proposed regulation procedure involving sibling consent before registration.

What did the court decide?

Impugned refusal check slip set aside; direction to obtain details of siblings and issue notices for registration.

Periyadurai Vs The District Registrar (Admin) — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.772 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 09.02.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.772 of 2023

Periyadurai

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Registrar (Admin), Registration Office, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶11

2.The Joint Sub Registrar No.II, Thirunagar, Tirunelveli Town, Tirunelveli – 627 001. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned refusal check slip RFL/2 Tirunelveli/88/2022 in so far as denial of registration of partition deed dated 26.12.2022 on the file of the 2nd Respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the 2nd Respondent to register and return the partition deed dated 26.12.2022 executed by the Petitioner.

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/4

¶15

W.P(MD)No.772 of 2023

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Susikumar

¶17

For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheeskumar, Addl. Government Pleader.

¶18

ORDER

¶19

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶20

2.The petitioner's parents namely, Pandi and Subbulakshmi are no more.

¶21

The petitioner has a brother by name Chinnadurai and three sisters. The petitioner's mother purchased the petition mentioned properties. She executed a Will dated 20.12.2003. The petitioner's mother passed away on 30.09.2015. Based on the said Will executed by the mother, the children entered into a partition deed among themselves on 26.12.2022. It was presented for registration. The second respondent declined to entertain the document and issued the impugned refusal check slip on the ground that the partition deed is based on an unregistered Will and that therefore the partition deed cannot be registered. Challenging the said refusal check slip, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶22

3.After hearing the learned counsel on either side, I am satisfied that the impugned refusal check slip has to be necessarily set aside. A Will does not

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶24

W.P(MD)No.772 of 2023

¶25

require registration. However, the genuineness of the Will can be tentatively gone into. While the petitioner need not prove the same before the second respondent as it is done in Court of law, the second respondent will be justified

¶26

in calling upon the petitioner to obtain consent letters from the other legal heirs.

¶27

4.This approach was adopted by a learned Judge of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.21289 of 2021 dated 30.11.2021. Adopting the same approach, I call upon the petitioner to give the address details of his siblings (brother and sisters) while re-presenting the document. The registering authority/second respondent shall issue notice to the petitioner's siblings. If no objection is received, the second respondent is bound to register the partition deed subject to fulfilment of other usual formalities.

¶28

5.The writ petition is allowed on these terms. No costs.

¶29

09.02.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

3/4

¶32

W.P(MD)No.772 of 2023

¶33

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶34

ias

¶35

To:

¶36

1.The District Registrar (Admin), Registration Office, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶37

2.The Joint Sub Registrar No.II, Thirunagar, Tirunelveli Town, Tirunelveli – 627 001.

¶38

W.P(MD)No.772 of 2023

¶39

09.02.2023

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

4/4

Periyadurai v. The District Registrar (Admin)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Periyadurai v. The District Registrar (Admin)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Secretary Vs The Secretary to Government

Justin Raj Vs Salomi

D.Angeline Stella Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Kottaisamy.M Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Sivajirajan Vs The Secretary to Government

Ashok Kumar Vs The Secretary to Government