The Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the rejection of tenders by TANTRANSCO, noting that a similar petition regarding the same issue had already been dismissed by this Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.2710 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 04.12.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P.(MD)No.2710 of 2018 and WMP(MD) Nos.2896 & 2897 of 2018
M.K.Karuppannan ... Petitioner
Vs
1.The Chief Engineer(Personnel), TANGEDCO and TANTRANSCO Office of Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Anna Salai, Chennai.
2.The Superintending Engineer, General Construction Circle, TANTRANSCO, K.Pudur, Madurai -7. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus call for the records pertaining to tenders ID No.2017_E.B_82346_1, 2017_E.B_82344_1, 2017_E.B_82350_1, 2017_E.B_82373_1, 2017_E.B_82343_1, 2017_E.B_82340_1, 2017_E.B_82314_1,
1/5
W.P.(MD)No.2710 of 2018
2017_E.B_82312_1, 2017_E.B_82308_1, 2017_E.B_82307_1, 2018_E.B_84118_1, 2018_E.B_84108_1, 2018_E.B_84106_1, 2018_E.B_84069_1, 2018_E.B_84068_1, 2017_E.B_84067_1, 2017_E.B_82870_1, 2017_E.B_82868_1, 2017_E.B_82866_1, 2017_E.B_82864_1, 2017_E.B_82861_1, 2017_E.B_82860_1, 2017_E.B_82380_1, 2017_E.B_82377_1, 2017_E.B_82375_1 and quash the rejection of tender dated 01.02.2018 and 03.02.2018 and consequently direct the second respondent to reconsider the tender on all other technical aspect and finalize the tender.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Alaguram Jothi For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadayalan Standing Counsel
O R D E R
This writ petition is filed as against the rejection of tender application submitted by the petitioner dated 01.02.2018 and 03.02.2018 and consequently direct the second respondent to reconsider the tender.
2/5
W.P.(MD)No.2710 of 2018
2.Today(04.12.2023), when this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submits that a similar writ petition with regard to this issue has already been decided by this Court and it was dismissed. Therefore, this writ petition is also liable to be dismissed.
3.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
04.12.2023
NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. vrn
3/5
W.P.(MD)No.2710 of 2018
To
4/5
W.P.(MD)No.2710 of 2018
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
vrn
Order made in W.P.(MD)No.2710 of 2018 and WMP(MD) Nos.2896 & 2897 of 2018
04.12.2023
5/5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking reconsideration of rejected tenders, where a similar issue was previously dismissed by this Court, is maintainable.
M.K. Karuppannan
The Chief Engineer(Personnel), TANGEDCO and TANTRANSCO Office of Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Anna Salai, Chennai
The Superintending Engineer, General Construction Circle, TANTRANSCO, K.Pudur, Madurai -7
B. PUGALENDHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
