Arulmozhi v. Ramachandran
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge ordered the closure of a contempt petition with liberty to challenge the rejection order. No substantive disposal of the contempt matter was made in this judgment.
What did the court decide?
Closure of contempt petition with liberty to challenge the order dated 29.11.2023.
What the court decided
Cont.P(MD)No.680 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 01.12.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
Cont.P(MD)No.680 of 2023 in W.P(MD)No.11244 of 2017
Arulmozhi
... Petitioner/Petitioner
vs.
Ramachandran, The Tahsildar, Rajapalayam, Virdhunagar District. ... Contemnor/Respondent
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent / contemnor for the wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in WP(MD)No.11244 of 2017 dated 19.06.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.Chamundi Bose
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arulmozhi
- respondent
Ramachandran, The Tahsildar, Rajapalayam, Virdhunagar District
Coram
B.Pugalandhi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court