Petitioners sought writs to quash an order refusing lease extension for canals and direct a 5-year extension. Court recorded that relief had become infructuous and closed the petitions.
Writ petitions closed, no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)Nos.21566 and 21567 of 2016
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 11.12.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P.(MD)Nos.21566 and 21567 of 2016 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.15427 to 15430 of 2016
M.Selvam ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No. 21566 of 2016 R.Ramesh Kannan ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No. 21567 of 2016
versus
1/4
W.P.(MD)Nos.21566 and 21567 of 2016
Prayer in W.P.(MD)No.21566 of 2016: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the 1st respondent herein in Lr.No.Tha3/Ke27/Meenpasi/2016/dated 07.10.2016, quash the same and consequently, direct the 1st respondent herein to extend the period of lease of the petitioner for 5 years from 25.02.2016 in respect of Alangulam Kanmoi and Bodiya Goundanpatti Sirukulam Kanmoi situated within the Manjalar Sub Division, Channel Division-2, Batlagundu, Dindigul District with an increase of 10% lease every year as per G.O.Ms.No.332 Animal Husbandry & Fisheries (FS-IV) Department dated 17.11.1993 and as per the representation of the petitioner dated 02.08.2016 within a reasonable time.
Prayer in W.P.(MD)No.21567 of 2016: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the 1st respondent herein in Lr.No.Tha3/Ke27/Meenpasi/2016/dated 07.10.2016, quash the same and consequently, direct the 1st respondent herein to extend the period of lease of the petitioner for 5 years from 23.12.2015 in respect of Periyakulam Kanmoi and Vedakulam Kanmoi, situated within the Manjalar Sub Division, Channel Division-2, Batlagundu, Dindigul District with an increase of 10% lease every year as per G.O.Ms.No.
2/4
W.P.(MD)Nos.21566 and 21567 of 2016
332 Animal Husbandry & Fisheries (FS-IV) Department dated 17.11.1993 and as per the representation of the petitioner dated 02.08.2016 within a reasonable time.
For Petitioner in W.Ps. : Mr.K.Appadurai For Respondents : Mr.M.Sarangan, in both W.Ps. Additional Government Pleader
COMMON ORDER
Today, when these writ petitions are taken up for hearing, the
learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the relief sought for in these writ petitions have become infructuous. He has also made an
endorsement to that effect.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
11.12.2023
ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No.
3/4
W.P.(MD)Nos.21566 and 21567 of 2016
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ogy
To
W.P.(MD)Nos.21566 and 21567 of 2016
11.12.2023
4/4
M.Selvam
R.Ramesh Kannan
The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department
The Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works Department
The Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department
B.Pugalandhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
