In the Madras High Court, a writ petition seeking mandamus for patta issuance was closed without costs. The court noted the distressed coordinates already rejected the petitioners request.
Writ petition closed; respondents directed to furnish copy of proceedings via registered post.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.17016 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 08.12.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P(MD)No.17016 of 2012 and MP(MD) No.1 of 2013
1.P.Rajagopal
2.R.Dhanalakshmi
3.R.Karuppiah Gopi
4.R.Rekha ... Petitioners
Vs
1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.08.2012 for issuance of patta in accordance with the law within the time limit as fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.Sarangan Additional Government Pleader
1/4
W.P(MD)No.17016 of 2012
O R D E R
This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus, directing the
second respondent herein to consider the petitioners' representation dated 07.08.2012 for issuance of patta.
2.Today(08.12.2023), when this writ petition is taken up
for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners.
3.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing
for the respondents submits that in view of the pendency of the civil proceedings and this writ petition, they have not taken any decision on the petitioners' representation. However, in pursuant to the earlier order of this Court, dated 29.08.2023, now the District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District/the second respondent herein has passed an order vide his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.30870/2020/D6, dated 04.12.2023, rejecting the request of the petitioners. Copy of the proceedings has also been produced before this Court.
2/4
W.P(MD)No.17016 of 2012
4.Recording the submission made by the learned
Additional Government Pleader and the proceedings of the District Revenue Officer, dated 04.12.2023, this writ petition is closed. The respondents are directed to furnish a copy of the proceedings to the petitioners through a registered post. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.
08.12.2023
NCC :Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes vrn
To
1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
3/4
W.P(MD)No.17016 of 2012
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
vrn
Order made in W.P(MD)No.17016 of 2012 and MP(MD) No.1 of 2013
08.12.2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition requires further adjudication regarding the patta issuance representation.
P.Rajagopal and others
The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul
The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul
B. PUGALENDHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
