Allowed

Paramasivam P v. The Director General of Police

Madras HC18 Apr 2023WP(MD)/16409/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court held that since the Division Bench had already quashed the disputed Police Report (P.R.37 of 2009) in a prior appeal, no substantive matter survived for adjudication in this fresh writ petition, leading to its closure.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is closed as the underlying issue was already resolved in a prior appellate order quashing the impugned police report.

Paramasivam P Vs The Director General… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.16409 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 18.04.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.16409 of 2021

P.Paramasivam

... Petitioner

vs.

1.The Director General of Police, Post Box No.601, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

¶11

2.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari.

¶12

3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli.

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/4

¶16

W.P.(MD)No.16409 of 2021

¶17

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the impugned order in R.C.No.183069/Con V(1)/2008, dated 10.08.2021, on the file of the 1^st respondent and to quash the same.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai For Respondents : Mr.P.Thambidurai Government Advocate

¶19

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

The petitioner has already filed a writ petition in W.P.(MD)No. 5816 of 2010, challenging the P.R.37 of 2009, dated 12.03.2009 and the said writ petition was dismissed, against which the petitioner preferred writ appeal in W.A.(MD)No.1257 of 2018 and this Court, vide order, dated 01.03.2023, had quashed the P.R.37 of 2009, dated 12.03.2009.

¶22

2.The petitioner had filed the present writ petition challenging the same P.R. Since the Hon'ble Division Bench has already quashed the

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

2/4

¶25

W.P.(MD)No.16409 of 2021

¶26

impugned P.R., nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is closed. No costs.

¶27

Index : Yes / No 18.04.2023 Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No Tmg

¶28

Note. Issue order copy on 19.04.2023.

¶29

¶30

1.The Director General of Police, Post Box No.601, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

¶31

2.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari.

¶32

3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli.

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

3/4

¶35

W.P.(MD)No.16409 of 2021

¶36

S.SRIMATHY, J

¶37

Tmg

¶38

W.P.(MD)No.16409 of 2021

¶39

18.04.2023

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

4/4

Paramasivam P v. The Director General of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Paramasivam P v. The Director General of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pl. Kalaimathi Vs the Dist. Collector

P.Jeevarani Vs The Assistant Director (Audit)

Chinnakanni Vs The Director

M.Karthigai Raja Vs the Additional Chief Secretary

H.Jayakumar Vs the Superintendent of Police

N.Catherine, W/O.Godwin Vs the Director of School