The petitioner, working as contract labour for TANGEDCO, filed a writ petition for regularization of service and benefits. The Court held that erection work was not continuous, terminating upon completion, establishing no employer-employee relationship. The writ petition was dismissed.
No regularization of service or benefits granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD).No.10889 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated :20.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
W.P.(MD).No.10889 of 2019
Stalin
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Chairman Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), Distribution and Operation, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai.
2.The Chief Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) Distribution and Operation, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai.
3.The Superintendent of Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), Distribution and Operation, Vallam Road, Thanjavur District.
1/8
W.P(MD).No.10889 of 2019
4.The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) Operation and Maintenance, Vallam Road, Thanjavur District.
5.The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) Operation and Maintenance, Kumbakonam Kottam, Rajan Thottam, Thiruvidaimaruthur Road, Kumbakonam Taluk Thanjavur District.
... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.03.2018 and thereby direct the respondents to regularize his service with all benefits as per Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workman) Act, 1981.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthil Kumar For Respondents : Mr.P.Malini for M/s.T.S.Gopalan & Co.
2/8
W.P(MD).No.10889 of 2019
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed for writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.03.2018 and thereby, direct the respondents to regularize his service with all benefits as per Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workman) Act, 1981.
not taken steps to regularise the service of the petitioner. But, the 5th respondent has regularised the petitioner’s juniors. Hence, by citing the same, the petitioner repeatedly approached the respondents to regularise his service. But the respondents have not consider the same. Therefore, the petitioner had finally submitted a representation to the respondents on 19.03.2018 to regularise his service as per Section 3 (1) of the Tamilnadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act 1981. It is stated that “a
W.P(MD).No.10889 of 2019
workman who has completed 480 days of continuous service in a period of 24 calendar months, would become automatically a permanent employee under employer, even if, an employer has not conferred him with the permanent status or even if no direction is issued by the competent authority under the Act 1981 or the Rules framed”. In various judgments rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Hon'ble Principal Bench and this Court, it is held that a workman, who has completed 480 days of continuous service in a period of 24 calendar months would become automatically an employee under the employer. Since the petitioner is working under the 5th respondent from the year 2000 onwards and the same has been confirmed by the certificate issued by the Board, the petitioner has fulfilled all the conditions to regularise his service with all benefits. The petitioner is relying on the certificate issued by Executive Engineer. The next evidence that is relied by the petitioner is K2 agreement as well as the chit agreement, issued by one Stalin. But the respondents have not considered the petitioner's grievance till date for the reasons best known to them. Hence, the petitioner has filed this writ petition before this Court.
Counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.
4/8
W.P(MD).No.10889 of 2019
who has participated in the erection work of the electric poles. Erection of polies is not a continuous process. After the erection is over, the contract would come to an end. If any fresh erection of poles work ought to be carried then a fresh contract would be issued to the successful bidder for another erection work. Therefore, there is no employee and employer relationship between the petitioner and the respondent. Moreover, the petitioner claims to have worked in the year 2001, but, he has not participated in the identifiaction parade, which was conducted in the year 2008. As far as the agreement entered on 03.08.2010, it is not stated from which period to which period, the work was carried out by the petitioner. From the above evidence, it is seen that the petitioner was not continuously engaged as a contract labour. The execution work contract can at the most be termed as service contract or works contract. It is not an employment and there is no employee and employer relationship. Hence, the petitioner is not entitled to regularise the service.
W.P(MD).No.10889 of 2019
order as to costs.
20.04.2023
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No sbn
W.P(MD).No.10889 of 2019
To
1.The Chairman
No.144, Anna Salai,
Chennai.
2.The Chief Engineer,
No.144, Anna Salai,
Chennai.
3.The Superintendent of Engineer,
Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), Distribution and Operation, Vallam Road, Thanjavur District.
Vallam Road, Thanjavur District.
Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) Operation and Maintenance, Kumbakonam Kottam, Rajan Thottam, Thiruvidaimaruthur Road, Kumbakonam Taluk Thanjavur District.
W.P(MD).No.10889 of 2019
S.SRIMATHY, J.
sbn
W.P.(MD).No.10889 of 2019
20.04.2023 2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, employed as contract labour on erection work, is entitled to regularization of service under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen
Whether an employee and employer relationship existed between the petitioner and the respondents.
Stalin
Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO)
S.Srimathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
