Disposed

M.Sivakumar v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC18 May 2023WP/7418/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the police to provide protection for his family members and property during construction of a compound wall. The Court, without expressing an opinion on merits, directed the police to issue notice and dispose of the representation within two weeks pending a hearing, then disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed the first respondent to issue notice to all parties and dispose of the representation within two weeks after hearing.

M.Sivakumar Vs The Inspector of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.7418 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 18.05.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN

¶6

WP.No.7418 of 2023

¶7

M.Sivakumar Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1.The Inspector of Police Sirupakkam Police Station, Cuddalore District. 2.Venkatesan 3.Paramasivam 4.Azhagammal

¶10

5.Vijayalakshmi ... Respondents Prayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to provide the police protection to the petitioner family members and the petitioner property construction compound wall in the petitioner's property comprised in Survey Number 348/5. 00106 sq.mt and Patta

¶11

1/4

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

W.P.No.7418 of 2023

¶14

No.169. Situated at in Malaiyanur Village, Veppur Taluk, Cuddalore

¶15

District in pursuant to the petitioner's representation dated 28.12.2022.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.P.D.Anbarasan For R3 to R5 : Mr.Krishnaswamy Chinnasamy For R1 : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

This writ petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to

¶19

provide the police protection to the petitioner and his family members for

¶20

construction of compound wall in the petitioner's property comprised in Survey Number 348/5. 00106 sq.mt and Patta No.169. Situated at in Malaiyanur Village, Veppur Taluk, Cuddalore District in pursuant to the

¶21

petitioner's representation dated 28.12.2022.

¶22

Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶23

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of this writ

¶24

petition, this Court is inclined to direct the first respondent to issue

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.No.7418 of 2023

¶28

notice to the petitioner and private respondents 2 to 5 and after giving opportunity of hearing them to dispose of the representation within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶29

4. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶30

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶31

18.05.2023

¶32

Internet: Yes Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order jai/shr

¶33

¶34

1. The Inspector of Police Sirupakkam Police Station, Cuddalore District.

¶35

2. The Government Advocate(Crl. Side) Madras High Court.

¶36

3/4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.7418 of 2023

A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.

jai/shr

W.P.No.7418 of 2023

¶42

18.05.2023

¶43

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.Sivakumar v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Sivakumar v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naveen Kumar Patel Vs the Inspector of Police

T.Muthuraj Vs the State of Tamil Nadu Rep by

Ankit Kumar Vs State through

Rajesh Vs the Inspector of Police

Murugan @ Vada Murugan Vs State Rep. by

Raji Vs State Rep.by